Holmes-James v. King County Court et al
Filing
3
ORDER declining to review 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Filer has until 3/17/2017 to correct IFP deficiency. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida.(swt) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS - copy of IFP motion and IFP form also mailed)
1
2
3
4
5
17UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
GENEVA HOLMES-JAMES,
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
11
KING COUNTY COURT, et al.,
CASE NO. C17-321RSL
ORDER DECLINING TO REVIEW
IFP APPLICATION AND
GRANTING LEAVE TO CORRECT
DEFICIENCIES
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 1. The application
14
is deficient because plaintiff did not date and sign the Written Consent for Payment of Costs
15
Under Local Rule CR 3(b) section of the IFP form, and also failed to date the declaration portion
16
of the IFP form. See Dkt.1 at 2. Plaintiff must correct this deficiency no later than March 17,
17
2017. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in a recommendation that this matter be
18
dismissed.
19
The Clerk shall provide a copy of this Order, plaintiff’s original IFP application (Dkt. 1),
20
and the Court’s standard IFP form to plaintiff and to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik.
21
//
22
//
23
//
ORDER DECLINING TO REVIEW IFP
APPLICATION AND GRANTING LEAVE TO
CORRECT DEFICIENCIES - 1
1
DATED this 3rd day of March, 2017.
2
A
3
BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA
United States Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER DECLINING TO REVIEW IFP
APPLICATION AND GRANTING LEAVE TO
CORRECT DEFICIENCIES - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?