Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chen et al
Filing
73
ORDER granting relief in parties' 72 Joint Status Report. SEC's motion and supporting papers will be due 10/16/2019; Defendants' opposition will be due on 11/20/2019; and the SEC's reply will be due on 12/4/2019. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
CASE NO. C17-0405JLR
ORDER
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
ANDY SHIN FONG CHEN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
Before the court is the parties’ September 27, 2019, joint status report. (JSR (Dkt.
16
# 72).) The JSR explains that counsel for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission
17
(“the SEC”) “has received approval from [the SEC] for a requested penalty amount in
18
this matter.” (Id. at 1.) The JSR also indicates that Defendants’ counsel still needs
19
additional information about the immigration status of remaining investors and that
20
Defendants cannot yet determine whether they will “request a hearing for remedies
21
determination.” (Id. at 1-2.) Despite these outstanding issues, the parties have agreed on
22
ORDER - 1
1
the following briefing schedule for the remedies phase of this proceeding: (1) the SEC’s
2
motion and supporting papers will be due October 16, 2019; (2) Defendants’ opposition
3
will be due on November 20, 2019; and (3) the SEC’s reply will be due on December 4,
4
2019. (Id. at 2.) The parties also indicate that they intend to exchange additional
5
information before October 16, 2019, and “examine the possibility of stipulated
6
resolution.” (Id.)
7
8
9
The court finds this proposal appropriate. Accordingly, the relief requested in
parties’ JSR is GRANTED. (Dkt. # 72.)
Dated this 27th day of September, 2019.
10
11
A
12
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?