Jennings(s) v. Wells Fargo et al

Filing 14

ORDER granting Defendants Wells Fargo, World Savings, World Savings Company & MERS 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc Plaintiff via USPS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8

SUZANNE JENNINGS(S),

9
10
11
12

Case No. C17-406RSL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A. AND
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.’S
MOTION TO DISMISS

v.
WELLS FARGO, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P.

15

12(b)(6) of defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems,

16

Inc. (MERS). Dkt. # 7. Plaintiff has not opposed defendants’ motion to dismiss, and the Court

17

considers such a failure to be “an admission that the motion has merit.” Local Civil Rule

18

7(b)(2). The Court has also reviewed the record in this matter and finds that plaintiff’s claims

19

against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and MERS are both time-barred and insufficiently pled.

20

Defendants’ motion is therefore GRANTED, and plaintiff’s claims against Wells Fargo Bank,

21

N.A. and MERS are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

22

Dated this 19th day of April, 2017.

23
24

A

25

Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS - 1