Jennings(s) v. Wells Fargo et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting Defendant Duke Partners II's 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; plaintiff's claims against Duke Partners II, LLC are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (Duke Partners II terminated.)(SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 SUZANNE JENNINGS(S), 9 10 11 12 Case No. C17-406RSL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DUKE PARTNERS II, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. WELLS FARGO, et al., Defendants. 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 12(b)(6) of defendant Duke Partners II, LLC. Dkt. # 10. Plaintiff has not opposed defendant’s 16 motion to dismiss, and the Court considers such a failure to be “an admission that the motion has 17 merit.” Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). The Court has also reviewed the record in this matter and 18 finds that plaintiff’s claims against Duke Partners II, LLC are both waived and insufficiently 19 pled. Defendant’s motion is therefore GRANTED, and plaintiff’s claims against Duke Partners 20 II, LLC are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 21 Dated this 31st day of May, 2017. 22 23 A 24 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 25 26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?