Jennings(s) v. Wells Fargo et al
Filing
19
ORDER granting Defendant Duke Partners II's 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; plaintiff's claims against Duke Partners II, LLC are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (Duke Partners II terminated.)(SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
SUZANNE JENNINGS(S),
9
10
11
12
Case No. C17-406RSL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DUKE
PARTNERS II, LLC’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
v.
WELLS FARGO, et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P.
15
12(b)(6) of defendant Duke Partners II, LLC. Dkt. # 10. Plaintiff has not opposed defendant’s
16
motion to dismiss, and the Court considers such a failure to be “an admission that the motion has
17
merit.” Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). The Court has also reviewed the record in this matter and
18
finds that plaintiff’s claims against Duke Partners II, LLC are both waived and insufficiently
19
pled. Defendant’s motion is therefore GRANTED, and plaintiff’s claims against Duke Partners
20
II, LLC are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
21
Dated this 31st day of May, 2017.
22
23
A
24
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
25
26
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?