Jennings(s) v. Wells Fargo et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting Defendant Duke Partners II's 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; plaintiff's claims against Duke Partners II, LLC are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (Duke Partners II terminated.)(SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8

SUZANNE JENNINGS(S),

9
10
11
12

Case No. C17-406RSL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DUKE
PARTNERS II, LLC’S MOTION TO
DISMISS

v.
WELLS FARGO, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P.

15

12(b)(6) of defendant Duke Partners II, LLC. Dkt. # 10. Plaintiff has not opposed defendant’s

16

motion to dismiss, and the Court considers such a failure to be “an admission that the motion has

17

merit.” Local Civil Rule 7(b)(2). The Court has also reviewed the record in this matter and

18

finds that plaintiff’s claims against Duke Partners II, LLC are both waived and insufficiently

19

pled. Defendant’s motion is therefore GRANTED, and plaintiff’s claims against Duke Partners

20

II, LLC are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

21

Dated this 31st day of May, 2017.

22
23

A

24

Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

25
26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS - 1