Jennings(s) v. Wells Fargo et al

Filing 28

ORDER granting Defendants Robert McDonald, Quality Loan Service Co, Tricia Willis's 24 Motion to Dismiss ; Additionally, in light of plaintiff's failure to respond to the Court's 26 Order to Show Cause by June 30, 2017, all of plaintiff's remaining claims are hereby DISMISSED, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8

SUZANNE JENNINGS(S),

9
10
11

Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Case No. C17-406RSL
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP.
OF WASHINGTON, ROBERT W.
MCDONALD, ESQ. AND TRICIA
WILLIS’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AND DISMISSING REMAINING
CLAIMS FOR FAILURE TO SHOW
CAUSE

This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(6) of defendants Quality Loan Service Corp. of Washington, Robert W. McDonald, Esq.,
and Tricia Willis. Dkt. # 24. Plaintiff has not opposed defendant’s motion to dismiss, and the
Court considers such a failure to be “an admission that the motion has merit.” Local Civil Rule
7(b)(2). The Court has also reviewed the record in this matter and finds that plaintiff’s claims
against the above-named defendants are both waived and insufficiently pled. Defendants’
motion is therefore GRANTED, and plaintiff’s claims against Quality Loan Service Corp. of
Washington, Robert W. McDonald, Esq., and Tricia Willis are hereby DISMISSED with
prejudice.

24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
AND DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS - 1

1

Additionally, in light of plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause

2

by June 30, 2017, Dkt. # 26, all of plaintiff’s remaining claims are hereby DISMISSED. The

3

Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment against plaintiff and in favor of defendants.

4
5
6
7
8

Dated this 24th day of July, 2017.

A
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
AND DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS - 2