Carter v. Hagens Berman Sobel Shapiro LLP

Filing 24

MINUTE ORDER advising plaintiff's counsel Mr. Russo and Mr. DeJohn that unless they are granted leave to appear pro hac vice within 35 days, the court will consider plaintiff to be proceeding pro se. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of thi s Minute Order to all counsel of record and to send a copy of this Minute Order via U.S. mail to Mr. Russon and Mr. DeJohn, who are directed to serve a copy of this Minute Order on plaintiff and to file proof of such service within 7 days of the date of this Minute Order by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (RS) cc Russon and DeJohn by US Mail

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 VAN CARTER, 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, C17-436 TSZ v. HAGENS BERMAN SOBEL SHAPIRO, LLP, MINUTE ORDER Defendant. 11 12 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 13 (1) By letter dated March 20, 2017, docket no. 19, Angelo Russo and Michael DeJohn were advised that, before they may act as counsel of record for plaintiff in this 14 action, they must apply for leave to appear pro hac vice. To date, no such application has been received from either Mr. Russo or Mr. DeJohn. Mr. Russo and Mr. DeJohn are 15 hereby ADVISED that, unless they are granted leave to appear pro hac vice within thirtyfive (35) days of the date of this Minute Order, the Court will consider plaintiff to be 16 proceeding pro se. 17 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record and to send a copy of this Minute Order via U.S. mail to Mr. Russon and 18 Mr. DeJohn, who are DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Minute Order on plaintiff and to file proof of such service within seven (7) days of the date of this Minute Order. 19 Dated this 27th day of April, 2017. 20 William M. McCool Clerk 21 22 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?