Palamaryuk v. Kelly et al
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER re parties' 28 Stipulated MOTION and Order for an Extension. IT IS ORDERED that parties' deadline to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation is extended to March 9, 2018. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH) (Kirstjen Nielson added. Elaine Duke, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security terminated)
1
District Judge Marsha J. Pechman
Chief Magistrate Judge James P. Donohue
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
10
11
DAVID PALAMARYUK,
CASE NO. C17-441-MJP-JPD
12
14
STIPULATED MOTION AND
ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION
Plaintiff,
13
v.
KIRSTJEN NIELSON, 1 Secretary of the United
15 States Department of Homeland Security;
16 THOMAS D. HOMAN, Acting Director,
Note on Motion Calendar:
February 5, 2018
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and
17 BRYAN WILCOX, Acting Field Office
Director, Immigration and Customs
18 Enforcement, Seattle Field Office,
19
Defendants.
20
21
JOINT STIPULATION
22
The parties stipulate and agree that the parties may have a thirty-day extension to file any
23
objections to the Report and Recommendation issued on January 17, 2018 (Dkt. #27). Pursuant
24
25 to that Report and Recommendation, objections are due by February 7, 2018. If the extension
26 were granted, the parties would file their objections by March 9, 2018.
27
28
1
Kirstjen Nielson has been sworn in as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security. Pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), she is automatically substituted for Elaine Duke as the proper party in her official capacity.
Stipulation and Order
C17-441-MJP-JPD - 1
1
Good cause exists for this extension. The parties are attempting to resolve this matter
2 without further involvement from the Court, thereby saving the parties’ and the Court’s
3
resources. The parties are attempting to agree on the appropriate accommodation to provide to
4
5
plaintiff in light of his circumstances. The parties need additional time to resolve that issue.
6 The parties are also working cooperatively to attempt to resolve the amount of attorney’s fees
7 plaintiff is due. The parties seek to avoid the expenditure of additional time and government
8
resources that would result if the parties must write and file their objections while simultaneously
9
10
trying to resolve those matters.
Accordingly, the parties request an extension until March 9, 2018 to file any objections to
11
12 the Report and Recommendation.
13
//
14
15
//
16 //
17 //
18 //
19
//
20
21
//
22 //
23 //
24
//
25
26
//
27 //
28 //
Stipulation and Order
C17-441-MJP-JPD - 2
1
Dated this 5th day of February, 2018.
Dated this 5th day of February, 2018.
2
SUNBIRD LAW, PLLC
ANNETTE L. HAYES
United States Attorney
3
4
5
6
7
s/ Devin T. Theriot-Orr
Devin T. Theriot-Orr, WSBA 33995
1000 Fourth Ave., Suite 3200
Seattle, WA 98154
Phone: (206) 962-5052
Email: devin@sunbird.law
8
THORWARD IMMIGRATION LAW
9
s/ Sarah K. Morehead
SARAH K. MOREHEAD, WSBA No.
29680
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney=s Office
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271
Phone: 206-553-7970
Email: sarah.morehead@usdoj.gov
s/ Minda Thorward
Minda Thorward, WSBA No. 47594
5600 Rainier Ave. S., Suite 208
Seattle, WA 98118
Phone: (206) 607-7976
Email: minda@thorwardimmigrationlaw.com
10
11
12
13
s/ Gladys M. Steffens Guzmán
Gladys M. Steffens Guzmán, PR Bar No.
14250
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Office of Immigration
Litigation
P.O. Box 868 Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044
Email: gladys.steffens-guzman@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
14
15
Attorney for Defendants
16
17
18
ORDER
19
20
The parties having so stipulated, IT IS ORDERED that parties’ deadline to file any
21 objections to the Report and Recommendation is extended to March 9, 2018.
22
23
Dated this 6th day of February, 2018
24
26
A
27
Marsha J. Pechman
United States District Judge
25
28
Stipulation and Order
C17-441-MJP-JPD - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?