Palamaryuk v. Kelly et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting in part and denying in part defendants' 21 Motion to Dismiss. This matter is RE-REFERRED to Hon. James P. Donohue for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 DAVID PALAMARYUK, by and through his parent and next friend, AVRAM PALAMARYUK, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 v. Case No. C17-441-MJP-JPD ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ELAINE DUKE, et al., Defendants. 13 14 15 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, 16 Chief United States Magistrate Judge, any objections or responses to that, and the remaining 17 record, the Court finds and ORDERS: 18 (1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. 19 (2) Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 21, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in 20 part. Plaintiff’s Administrative Procedures Act claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff 21 may proceed with his Rehabilitation Act and Due Process claims. 22 (3) This matter is RE-REFERRED to Judge Donohue for further proceedings. 23 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - 1 1 (4) 2 Donohue. 3 The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge Dated this 12th day of March, 2018. 4 A 5 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?