Lyall v. U S Bank National Assocation et al

Filing 81

ORDER This Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Letter to the Court requesting reconsideration 70 . Plaintiff states that she suffered injuries the day before her response to Defendant's motion was due and therefore could not complete her response in time. In light of plaintiff's condition, the court grants plaintiff's motion for relief 70 . The court directs the clerk to reinstate defendants' 34 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Under FRCP 12(b)(6), or In The Alternative, for Summary Judgment Under FRCP 56, plaintiff's response due 7/6/17. Court will not consider any further extensions or requests for relief on this issue by Judge Richard A Jones. (RS)

THE HONORABLE JUDGE RICHARD A. JONES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
MARTA D. LYALL,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
U.S. BANK NATIONAL
)
ASSOCIATION; TRUMAN TITLE 2013 )
SC3 TITLE TRUST; TRUMAN
)
CAPITAL ADVISORS, LP;
)
RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT )
SERVICES, LLC; BANK OF AMERICA, )
N.A.; DITECH HOME LOAN
)
SERVICING; CWABS MASTER
)
TRUST, REVOLVING HOME EQUITY )
LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES,
)
SERIES 2004-"O"; CARNEGIE
)
MELLON UNIVERSITY; UNIVERSITY )
OF WASHINGTON; WASHINGTON
)
STATE DEPARTMENT OF
)
COMMERCE; DISPUTE RESOLUTION )
CENTER OF KING COUNTY; and
)
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-100,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No: 17-00472-RAJ
ORDER

This Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s Letter to the Court requesting
reconsideration. Dkt. # 70. Plaintiff states that she suffered injuries the day before her
response to Defendant’s motion was due and therefore could not complete her response

ORDER - 1

in time. Id. 1 In light of Plaintiff’s condition, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for
relief. Dkt. # 70.
The Court directs the clerk to reinstate Defendant’s motion to dismiss filed on
June 8, 2017. Dkt. # 34. Plaintiff must respond to this motion no later than July 6, 2017.
The Court will not consider any further extensions or requests for relief on this issue.

Dated this 29th day of June, 2017.

A
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge

1

The Court notes that the hospital record verifies a visit on June 26, 2017. Dkt. # 79. This visit
would have been the same day that Plaintiff was required to file her response rather than the day
before her response was due.

ORDER - 2