Curtis v. Leathers et al

Filing 24

ORDER renoting plaintiff's 23 MOTION for Extension of Time ; Noting Date 9/8/2017. Counsel for defendants shall indicate by 9/6/17 whether counsel will accept service on behalf of Leathers, or whether Mr. Curtis should attempt to effect personal service by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(James Curtis, Prisoner ID: 984533)(RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 JAMES EDWARD CURTIS, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 v. LEATHERS (FNU), WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER RENOTING MOTION AND REQUESTING CLARIFICATION ON SERVICE Defendants. On July 17, 2017, the Court directed service by mail to defendant Leathers’ (FNU) last known address, Dkt. 19, but it was returned as undeliverable on July 31, 2017. Dkt. 20. On August 28, 2017, plaintiff James Edward Curtis filed a motion for extension of time to effect service. Dkt. 23. He improperly noted the motion for September 15, 2017. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension, Dkt. 23, shall be renoted to September 8, 2017. 2. Counsel for the defendants shall indicate by September 6, 2017, whether counsel will 20 accept service on behalf of Leathers, or whether Mr. Curtis should attempt to effect 21 22 CASE NO. C17-474 RAJ-BAT personal service. 3. Copies of this order shall be provided to all parties. 23 ORDER RENOTING MOTION AND REQUESTING CLARIFICATION ON SERVICE - 1 1 DATED this 30th day of August, 2017. 2 A 3 BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER RENOTING MOTION AND REQUESTING CLARIFICATION ON SERVICE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?