Waste Action Project v. Fruhling Sand & Topsoil, Inc.
Filing
62
ORDER granting parties' 60 Stipulated Motion to Extend the Case Schedule. Bench Trial is set for 8/17/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 2/20/2020, Motions rela ted to discovery due by 3/19/2020, Discovery completed by 4/20/2020, Dispositive motions due by 5/21/2020, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 7/6/2020, Motions in Limine due by 7/20/2020, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 8/5/2020, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 8/12/2020, Trial briefs to be submitted by 8/12/2020. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
WASTE ACTION PROJECT,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
v.
CASE NO. C17-498 RSM
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
MOTION TO EXTEND THE CASE
SCHEDULE
FRUHLING SAND AND TOPSOIL, INC.,
Defendant.
12
13
14
This matter is before the Court on the parties stipulated motion to extend the case
15
schedule. Dkt. #60. At the request of the parties, the Court previously extended the case schedule
16
in this matter and struck the noting date of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
17
Dkt. #59. The parties requested the continuance to pursue settlement as they had agreed to
18
several factual contentions. Dkt. #58. The parties now indicate that they have made significant
19
progress towards an agreed resolution of this matter but need additional time to attempt to reach
20
a full settlement. Dkt. #60 at 1–2. Finding good cause for a continuance, the Court finds and
21
ORDERS:
22
23
1. The deadlines previously set in its Stipulated Motion and Order to Extend Case Schedule
and Strike Noting Date on Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. #59) are VACATED.
24
ORDER – 1
1
2
3
2. The parties’ Stipulated Motion and Order to Extend Case Schedule and Strike Noting
Date on Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. #60) is GRANTED.
3. The Court SETS the following deadlines:
4
Current Deadline
New Deadline
Disclosure of expert
testimony under FRCP
26(a)(2)
November 22, 2019
February 20, 2020
Deadline for filing motions
related to discovery. Any such
motions shall be noted for
consideration pursuant to
LCR 7(d)(3)
December 23, 2019
March 19, 2020
10
Discovery completed by
January 21, 2020
April 20, 2020
11
All dispositive motions must
be filed by and noted on the
motion calendar no later than
the fourth Friday thereafter
(see LCR 7(d))
February 20, 2020
May 21, 2020
Mediation per LCR
39.1(c)(3), if requested by the
parties, held no later than
April 6, 2020
July 6, 2020
All motions in limine must be
filed by and noted on the
motion calendar no later than
the THIRD Friday thereafter
April 21, 2020
July 20, 2020
Agreed pretrial order due
May 6, 2020
August 5, 2020
Pretrial conference to be
scheduled by the Court
To be scheduled by the
Court
To be scheduled by the
Court
Trial briefs and proposed
findings of fact and
conclusions of law,
designations of deposition
testimony pursuant to LCR
32(e), and trial exhibits due
May 13, 2020
August 12, 2020
5
6
7
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER – 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BENCH TRIAL DATE (5-7
days duration)
To be scheduled by the
Court for around May 18,
2020
August 17, 2020
Fruhling Response to WAP’s
Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment (Dkt. 45)
14 days following notice
to the Court that the
motion is re-noted
14 days following notice
to the Court that the
motion is re-noted
WAP Reply on Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment
(Dkt. 45)
14 days following notice
to the Court that the
motion is re-noted
28 days following notice
to the Court that the
motion is re-noted
Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment (Dkt. 45) Noting
Date
28 days following notice
to the Court that the
motion is re-noted
28 days following notice
to the Court that the
motion is re-noted
9
10
DATED this 6th day of November 2019.
11
A
12
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER – 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?