Waste Action Project v. Fruhling Sand & Topsoil, Inc.

Filing 62

ORDER granting parties' 60 Stipulated Motion to Extend the Case Schedule. Bench Trial is set for 8/17/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 2/20/2020, Motions rela ted to discovery due by 3/19/2020, Discovery completed by 4/20/2020, Dispositive motions due by 5/21/2020, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 7/6/2020, Motions in Limine due by 7/20/2020, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 8/5/2020, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be submitted by 8/12/2020, Trial briefs to be submitted by 8/12/2020. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 WASTE ACTION PROJECT, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 v. CASE NO. C17-498 RSM ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE CASE SCHEDULE FRUHLING SAND AND TOPSOIL, INC., Defendant. 12 13 14 This matter is before the Court on the parties stipulated motion to extend the case 15 schedule. Dkt. #60. At the request of the parties, the Court previously extended the case schedule 16 in this matter and struck the noting date of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. 17 Dkt. #59. The parties requested the continuance to pursue settlement as they had agreed to 18 several factual contentions. Dkt. #58. The parties now indicate that they have made significant 19 progress towards an agreed resolution of this matter but need additional time to attempt to reach 20 a full settlement. Dkt. #60 at 1–2. Finding good cause for a continuance, the Court finds and 21 ORDERS: 22 23 1. The deadlines previously set in its Stipulated Motion and Order to Extend Case Schedule and Strike Noting Date on Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. #59) are VACATED. 24 ORDER – 1 1 2 3 2. The parties’ Stipulated Motion and Order to Extend Case Schedule and Strike Noting Date on Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. #60) is GRANTED. 3. The Court SETS the following deadlines: 4 Current Deadline New Deadline Disclosure of expert testimony under FRCP 26(a)(2) November 22, 2019 February 20, 2020 Deadline for filing motions related to discovery. Any such motions shall be noted for consideration pursuant to LCR 7(d)(3) December 23, 2019 March 19, 2020 10 Discovery completed by January 21, 2020 April 20, 2020 11 All dispositive motions must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the fourth Friday thereafter (see LCR 7(d)) February 20, 2020 May 21, 2020 Mediation per LCR 39.1(c)(3), if requested by the parties, held no later than April 6, 2020 July 6, 2020 All motions in limine must be filed by and noted on the motion calendar no later than the THIRD Friday thereafter April 21, 2020 July 20, 2020 Agreed pretrial order due May 6, 2020 August 5, 2020 Pretrial conference to be scheduled by the Court To be scheduled by the Court To be scheduled by the Court Trial briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, designations of deposition testimony pursuant to LCR 32(e), and trial exhibits due May 13, 2020 August 12, 2020 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER – 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BENCH TRIAL DATE (5-7 days duration) To be scheduled by the Court for around May 18, 2020 August 17, 2020 Fruhling Response to WAP’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 45) 14 days following notice to the Court that the motion is re-noted 14 days following notice to the Court that the motion is re-noted WAP Reply on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 45) 14 days following notice to the Court that the motion is re-noted 28 days following notice to the Court that the motion is re-noted Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 45) Noting Date 28 days following notice to the Court that the motion is re-noted 28 days following notice to the Court that the motion is re-noted 9 10 DATED this 6th day of November 2019. 11 A 12 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER – 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?