LVB-Odgen Marketing Corporation v. Dean et al
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part LVB-Ogden Marketing's 44 Motion to Compel Compliance With Subpoena to CCRB Enterprises, LLC; denying CCRB's request for sanction against LVB (dkt. 48 ). Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
HENRY DEAN, as trustee of the
SHARON GRAHAM BINGHAM
2007 TRUST, and PARK PLACE
PATRICK L. MCCOURT, STEPHANIE
J. MCCOURT, DAVID S. BINGHAM,
SHARON BINGHAM, FRANCES P.
GRAHAM, CHRISTOPHER G.
BINGHAM, CHERISH BINGHAM
a/k/a CHERISH BURGESS, SCOTT F.
BINGHAM, KELLY BINGHAM, and
BINGO INVESTMENTS, LLC,
MINUTE ORDER- 1
C09-4518 (N.D. Ill.)
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
LVB-Ogden Marketing’s (“LVB”) Motion to Compel Compliance With
Subpoena to CCRB Enterprises, LLC (“CCRB”), docket no. 44 (the “Motion”), is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In CCRB’s response to the Motion, docket
no. 48, counsel for CCRB represents that he will accept service of the subpoena at issue
(docket no. 45–1) on behalf of CCRB. Id. at 2–3. The correspondence filed in support of
the Motion suggests that counsel for CCRB is already in possession of the subpoena. See
Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Jonathan J. Faria in Support of Motion to Compel Compliance
With Subpoena to CCRB Enterprises, LLC, docket no. 45-3. Thus, CCRB shall produce
any remaining documents responsive to the subpoena, along with its remaining
objections, within thirty (30) days of this Minute Order. Any objection not timely stated
shall be deemed waived unless the Court, for good cause, excuses the failure.
CCRB’s request for sanctions against LVB is DENIED. See docket no. 48,
9 at 5–7.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
Dated this 9th day of January, 2018.
William M. McCool
MINUTE ORDER- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?