Robinson v. SCORE Jail
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. Show Cause Response due by 6/12/2017. (cc: petitioner)(ST)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
REGINALD WAYNE ROBINSON,
Petitioner,
9
10
Case No. C17-0539-TSZ-MAT
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
11
RENTON MUNICIPAL COURT, et al.,
Respondents.
12
13
14
Petitioner Reginald Robinson is currently confined at the South Correctional Entity
15
(SCORE) in Des Moines, Washington. He has submitted to the Court for filing a petition for writ
16
of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a 2013 Renton Municipal Court judgment
17
and sentence. Petitioner asserts two grounds for relief in his petition, but neither claim alleges a
18
violation of a federal constitutional right.
19
Federal habeas relief does not lie for errors of state law. Lewis v. Jeffers, 497 U.S. 764,
20
780 (1990) (citing Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37, 41 (1983)). A federal district court may entertain
21
an application for a writ of habeas corpus by an individual in custody pursuant to a judgment of a
22
state court “only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or
23
treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). Because petitioner does not identify any
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
PAGE - 1
1
federal constitutional basis for the claims asserted in his petition, he has not stated a cognizable
2
ground for relief.
3
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
4
(1)
5
Petitioner shall SHOW CAUSE not later than June 12, 2017 why his federal habeas
petition should not be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable ground for relief.
6
(2)
7
Thomas S. Zilly.
8
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and to the Honorable
DATED this 8th day of May, 2017.
9
A
10
Mary Alice Theiler
United States Magistrate Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?