Ville v. First Choice in Home Care
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER re: Plaintiff's 29 Letter. The letter is not in a form proper for the court's consideration, see Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7, and accordingly, First Choice need not respond. Moreover, the court cannot order a party to settle a case and therefore, cannot grant the relief Ms. Ville requests. Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via first class mail
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
ISATU VILLE,
CASE NO. C17-0548JLR
Plaintiff,
11
MINUTE ORDER
v.
12
13
FIRST CHOICE IN HOME CARE,
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable
James L. Robart:
The court acknowledges that it received Plaintiff Isatu Ville’s latest letter on July
18
9, 2018. (See Letter (Dkt. # 29).) In her letter, Ms. Ville recounts the alleged events
19
giving rise to her claims and requests that the court order Defendant First Choice in
20
Home Care (“First Choice”) to settle the case for $1,000,000.00. (See generally id.) The
21
letter, however, is not in a form proper for the court’s consideration, see Local Rules
22
W.D. Wash. LCR 7, and accordingly, First Choice need not respond. Moreover, the
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
court cannot order a party to settle a case and therefore, cannot grant the relief Ms. Ville
2
requests. (See Letter at 4.)
3
Filed and entered this 17th day of July, 2018.
4
WILLIAM M. MCCOOL
Clerk of Court
5
s/ Ashleigh Drecktrah
Deputy Clerk
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?