Ville v. First Choice in Home Care

Filing 30

MINUTE ORDER re: Plaintiff's 29 Letter. The letter is not in a form proper for the court's consideration, see Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7, and accordingly, First Choice need not respond. Moreover, the court cannot order a party to settle a case and therefore, cannot grant the relief Ms. Ville requests. Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via first class mail

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 ISATU VILLE, CASE NO. C17-0548JLR Plaintiff, 11 MINUTE ORDER v. 12 13 FIRST CHOICE IN HOME CARE, Defendant. 14 15 16 17 The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable James L. Robart: The court acknowledges that it received Plaintiff Isatu Ville’s latest letter on July 18 9, 2018. (See Letter (Dkt. # 29).) In her letter, Ms. Ville recounts the alleged events 19 giving rise to her claims and requests that the court order Defendant First Choice in 20 Home Care (“First Choice”) to settle the case for $1,000,000.00. (See generally id.) The 21 letter, however, is not in a form proper for the court’s consideration, see Local Rules 22 W.D. Wash. LCR 7, and accordingly, First Choice need not respond. Moreover, the MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 court cannot order a party to settle a case and therefore, cannot grant the relief Ms. Ville 2 requests. (See Letter at 4.) 3 Filed and entered this 17th day of July, 2018. 4 WILLIAM M. MCCOOL Clerk of Court 5 s/ Ashleigh Drecktrah Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?