Board of Trustees of the B.A.C. Local No. 1 Washington Pension Trust v. Crosby Restoration Inc et al

Filing 35

ORDER of Default Judgment to be Entered Against Defendant Main Street Masonry Restoration re Plaintiff's 32 Motion for Default Judgment signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)

Download PDF
1 THE HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL NO. 1 WASHINGTON PENSION TRUST, Plaintiff, NO. 2:17-cv-00551-RAJ 10 v. 11 12 13 CROSBY RESTORATION INC., GHB CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF WASHINGTON, and MAIN STREET MASONRY RESTORATION, 14 ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT MAIN STREET MASONRY RESTORATION [PROPOSED] Defendants. 15 16 Main Street Masonry Restoration (“Main Street”), having been served with Summons 17 and Complaint via the Washington Secretary of State; Main Street has failed to plead or 18 otherwise defend said action, the legal time for pleading or otherwise defending having expired 19 and default of Main Street having been duly entered according to law, upon the application of 20 Board of Trustees of the B.A.C. Local No. 1 Washington Pension Trust (“Trust”), Judgment is 21 hereby entered against Main Street pursuant to the prayer of the Trust’s First Amended 22 Complaint. 1 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Board of Trustees of the 2 B.A.C. Local No. 1 Washington Pension Trust have a Judgment for $17,231.25 against Main 3 Street which is the remaining withdrawal liability owed by Crosby Restoration, Inc. to the 4 Trust. 5 Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the highest allowable interest rate per annum 6 from date of entry of Default Judgment, until paid. 7 DATED this 30th day of May, 2018. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 A The Honorable Richard United States District Judge A. Jones

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?