Cen Com, Inc v. Numerex Corp et al

Filing 130

MINUTE ORDER re: Defendant's 129 Motion for Reconsideration construed by the Court as a Motion for Clarification. The Court now GRANTS Defendants' motion and CLARIFIES that nothing in the Court's prior Order precludes Defendants from refiling their Second Motion to Compel (Dkt. # 71 ), as tailored to the Counterclaims and any affirmative defenses thereto. Authorized by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 4 5 7 CEN COM, INC., a Washington Corporation doing business as American Digital Monitoring, 8 Plaintiff, 6 9 10 11 12 MINUTE ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. NUMEREX CORP., a Pennsylvania Corporation; NextAlarm, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 – 10, Defendants. 13 14 Case No. C17-0560RSM The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 15 Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge: 16 17 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration. 18 Dkt. #129. Although characterized as one for reconsideration, the Court instead construes the 19 motion as one for clarification. Accordingly, no response from Plaintiff is necessary. 20 In its prior Order the Court failed to recognize that some of the stricken discovery 21 motions pertained to Defendants’ Counterclaims, rather than to the dismissed causes of action. 22 Accordingly, the Court now GRANTS Defendants’ motion and CLARIFIES that nothing in 23 the Court’s prior Order precludes Defendants from refiling their Second Motion to Compel 24 25 (Dkt. #71), as tailored to the Counterclaims and any affirmative defenses thereto. 26 ORDER - 1 1 DATED this 1st day of June, 2018. 2 WILLIAM McCOOL, Clerk 3 By: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER - 2 /s/ Paula McNabb Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?