Cen Com, Inc v. Numerex Corp et al
Filing
154
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 120 Motion for Terminating Sanctions. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
9
10
Case No. C17-0560RSM
CEN COM, INC., a Washington Corporation
doing business as American Digital Monitoring,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
Plaintiff,
MOTION FOR TERMINATING
SANCTIONS
v.
11
12
13
14
15
NUMEREX CORP., a Pennsylvania
Corporation; NextAlarm, LLC, a Georgia
Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 – 10,
Defendants.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions.
16
Dkt. #120. Plaintiff seeks an Order dismissing all of Defendants’ counterclaims as a sanction for
17
18
19
their alleged overuse of the Attorneys’ Eyes Only (“AEO”) designation of documents during
discovery. Id. The Court DENIES this motion for counsels’ failure to engage in the appropriate
20
meet-and-confer required by this Court’s Rules and the stipulated Protective Order. LCR
21
37(a)(1) and Dkt. #19 at ¶ 7.2. The record reflects numerous discussions between counsel
22
regarding Defendants’ AEO designations. See Dkts. #122 and #143. However, having reviewed
23
that record, and the history of this matter, the Court is not convinced that the parties had reached
24
an impasse requiring the filing of the instant motion, or that all parties had engaged in a good
25
26
27
faith effort to resolve the dispute. For those reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions
(Dkt. #120) is DENIED.
ORDER - 1
1
DATED this 26th day of June, 2018.
2
3
A
4
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?