Cen Com, Inc v. Numerex Corp et al

Filing 154

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 120 Motion for Terminating Sanctions. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 Case No. C17-0560RSM CEN COM, INC., a Washington Corporation doing business as American Digital Monitoring, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS v. 11 12 13 14 15 NUMEREX CORP., a Pennsylvania Corporation; NextAlarm, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 – 10, Defendants. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions. 16 Dkt. #120. Plaintiff seeks an Order dismissing all of Defendants’ counterclaims as a sanction for 17 18 19 their alleged overuse of the Attorneys’ Eyes Only (“AEO”) designation of documents during discovery. Id. The Court DENIES this motion for counsels’ failure to engage in the appropriate 20 meet-and-confer required by this Court’s Rules and the stipulated Protective Order. LCR 21 37(a)(1) and Dkt. #19 at ¶ 7.2. The record reflects numerous discussions between counsel 22 regarding Defendants’ AEO designations. See Dkts. #122 and #143. However, having reviewed 23 that record, and the history of this matter, the Court is not convinced that the parties had reached 24 an impasse requiring the filing of the instant motion, or that all parties had engaged in a good 25 26 27 faith effort to resolve the dispute. For those reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions (Dkt. #120) is DENIED. ORDER - 1 1 DATED this 26th day of June, 2018. 2 3 A 4 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?