Hammou v. USCIS

Filing 13

ORDER dismissing Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to demonstrate good cause for Plaintiff's failure to comply with Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: plaintiff via first class mail

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 SANAA HAMMOU, Plaintiff, 11 v. CASE NO. C17-0572JLR ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 13 USCIS, Defendant. 14 15 On September 21, 2017, the court ordered Plaintiff Sanaa Hammou to show cause 16 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to serve Defendant with a summons 17 and copy of the complaint within the timeframe provided in Federal Rule of Civil 18 Procedure 4(m). (OSC (Dkt. # 12).) The court ordered Plaintiff to respond within ten 19 days and warned Plaintiff that a failure to demonstrate good cause for the failure to 20 comply with Rule 4(m) would result in dismissal of the action without prejudice. (Id. at 21 2.) More than ten days have passed since the court issued its order, and Plaintiff has 22 failed to respond. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, the court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s ORDER - 1 1 complaint without prejudice for failure to demonstrate good cause for Plaintiff’s failure to 2 comply with Rule 4(m). 3 Dated this 4th day of October, 2017. 4 5 A 6 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?