Bolding et al v. Banner Bank

Filing 230

ORDER re Parties' 229 STIPULATION RE-NOTING AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT BANNER BANK'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' OPT-IN DISCOVERY REQUESTS. Defendant's 227 Motion is re-noted to 9/18/2020; Plaintiffs' response to the Motion is due on 9/11/2020; and Defendant's reply is due on 9/18/2020. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)

Case 2:17-cv-00601-RSL Document 230 Filed 09/02/20 Page 1 of 2

The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10
11

KELLY BOLDING, and MICHAEL
MANFREDI, individually and on behalf of
a class of all others similarly situated,

12
13
14

Plaintiffs,
v.
BANNER BANK, a Washington Corporation,

15

Defendant.

16

No. C17-0601 RSL
STIPULATION AND
ORDER RE-NOTING AND
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON DEFENDANT BANNER
BANK’S MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER ON
PLAINTIFFS’ OPT-IN
DISCOVERY REQUESTS [DKT.
227]

17
18
STIPULATION

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

The parties, by and through their counsel, stipulate to the following re-noting and
briefing schedule on Defendant Banner Bank’s Motion for Protective Order on Plaintiffs’ Optin Discovery Requests (“Motion”) [Dkt. 227]. The parties jointly request that the Court enter
the following Order approving this Stipulation. In support, the parties represent the following
to the Court:
1.

On August 27, 2020, Defendant filed its Motion, which is noted on the Court’s

motion calendar for September 4, 2020. As presently noted, Plaintiffs’ response is due
September 2, 2020, and Plaintiffs’ reply is due September 4, 2020. See LCR 7(d)(2)(B).
STIPULATION AND ORDER
(C17-0601RSL) - 1
4819-4052-7817v.2 0058243-000340

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
L AW O FFICE S
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, WA 98101-3045
206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax

Case 2:17-cv-00601-RSL Document 230 Filed 09/02/20 Page 2 of 2

2.

1

Plaintiffs requested an extension of time to respond to the Motion. The parties

2

agreed that Defendant would re-note the Motion and extend the briefing schedule so that both

3

parties would have additional time for their respective response and reply.
3.

4
5

Based on the foregoing, the parties stipulate and jointly request that the Court

enter the proposed Order below approving the following briefing and re-noting schedule:

6

a.

Defendant’s Motion is re-noted to September 18, 2020;

7

b.

Plaintiffs’ response to the Motion is due on September 11, 2020; and

8

c.

Defendant’s reply is due on September 18, 2020.

It is so stipulated and presented by the following counsel this 1st day of September,

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

2020.
The Blankenship Law Firm, P.S.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Attorneys for Defendant Banner Bank

By s/ Scott C.G. Blankenship
Scott C. G. Blankenship, WSBA No. 21431
Richard E. Goldsworthy, WSBA No. 40684
Charlotte S. Sanders, WSBA No. 45051
1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3250
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

By s/ Melissa Mordy
Kenneth E. Payson, WSBA #26369
Sheehan Sullivan Weiss, WSBA #33189
Melissa Mordy, WSBA #41879
Laura-Lee Williams, WSBA #51358
920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
ORDER

21
22
23

The Court has considered and approves the parties’ stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED.
September
DATED this _____ day of ________, 2020.
2nd

24

Robert S. Lasnik
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER
(C17-0601RSL) - 2
4819-4052-7817v.2 0058243-000340

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
L AW O FFICE S
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, WA 98101-3045
206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax