Bolding et al v. Banner Bank
Filing
337
ORDER granting in part Defendant's 264 Motion to Seal. Defendant shall file redacted versions of the memoranda and exhibits for public viewing. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
Case 2:17-cv-00601-RSL Document 337 Filed 03/24/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
_______________________________________
)
KELLY BOLDING, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
BANNER BANK,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)
Case No. C17-0601RSL
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
BANNER BANK’S MOTION TO
SEAL (DKT. # 264)
13
This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Banner Bank’s Motion to Seal
14
Redacted Portions of Banner’s Motion to Disqualify and Exhibits Attached to the Declaration of
15
Sheehan Sullivan in Support of Motion to Disqualify.” Dkt. # 264. Exhibits H-J to the Sullivan
16
Declaration were designated as “confidential” when produced by plaintiffs during discovery, but
17
plaintiffs have not supported that designation in response to defendant’s motion. See Dkt. # 276.
18
With regards to the social security numbers included in defendants’ submissions, defendant
19
shall publicly file the exhibits and memoranda with all necessary redactions under LCR 5.2
20
(including social security numbers).
21
22
For the foregoing reasons, defendant’s motion to seal is GRANTED in part. Dkt. # 268,
23
269, and 282 shall remain under seal, but defendant shall file redacted versions of the
24
memoranda and exhibits for public viewing.
25
26
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
BANNER BANK’S MOTION TO
SEAL (DKT. # 264)
Case 2:17-cv-00601-RSL Document 337 Filed 03/24/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Dated this 24th day of March, 2021.
2
3
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
BANNER BANK’S MOTION TO
SEAL (DKT. # 264)
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?