Gonzalez Figueroa v. Wilcox et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. Petitioner's response is due July 10, 2017. Respondents' reply is due July 21, 2017. Clerk is directed to RE-NOTE respondents' motion to dismiss, Dkt. 3, for July 21, 2017.(ST)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 JESUS O. GONZALEZ FIGUEROA, Petitioner, 9 10 11 v. BRYAN S. WILCOX, et al., Case No. C17-603-JLR-JPD ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Respondents. 12 13 14 This is a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 immigration habeas action. Respondents’ return 15 memorandum and motion to dismiss is currently noted for June 30, 2017. Dkt. 3. Petitioner has 16 filed an unopposed motion for extension of time. Dkts. 6 (original motion) and 7-1 (corrected 17 motion). Having considered petitioner’s motion and the balance of the record, the Court 18 ORDERS: 19 (1) 20 Petitioner’s unopposed motion for extension of time, Dkts. 6 & 7-1, is GRANTED. 21 (2) Petitioner’s response is due July 10, 2017. 22 (3) Respondents’ reply is due July 21, 2017. 23 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 (4) 1 The Clerk is directed to RE-NOTE respondents’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 3, for 2 July 21, 2017, and to send copies of this order to the parties and to the Honorable James L. 3 Robart. 4 Dated this 13th day of June, 2017. 5 A 6 JAMES P. DONOHUE Chief United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?