Barton, Jr v. John Doe 1-6

Filing 13

ORDER dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via the U.S. Mail

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

HERMAN L. BARTON, JR.,

CASE NO. C17-0608JLR

11

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.
12
JOHN DOES 1-6, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

On June 26, 2017, the court dismissed pro se Plaintiff Herman L. Barton, Jr.’s first

16

amended complaint because he failed—for the second time—to allege facts providing a

17

basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction. (6/26/17 Order (Dkt. # 11) at 4-5.) The

18

court granted Mr. Barton until July 10, 2017, to amend his first amended complaint to

19

remedy this deficiency. (Id. at 6.) However, the court cautioned Mr. Barton that his

20

failure to timely amend the complaint or remedy the deficiencies identified in the court’s

21

order would result in dismissal without leave to amend. (Id.)

22

//

ORDER - 1

1

Mr. Barton’s deadline to file a second amended complaint passed on July 10,

2

2017, and he has filed nothing further in this matter. (See Dkt.) Accordingly, the court

3

DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE.

4

Dated this 11th day of July, 2017.

5

7

A

8

JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge

6

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER - 2