McCreary v. Berryhill
Filing
13
ORDER of Remand re parties' 12 Stipulated Motion to Remand. It is hereby ORDERED that the case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
CARL MCCREARY,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. C17-0615-JCC
ORDER OF REMAND
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
13
Defendant.
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on a stipulated motion for remand (Dkt. No. 12).
16
Based on the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be
17
REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four
18
of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
19
Upon remand, the Appeals Council will direct the ALJ to reevaluate the opinion evidence
20
pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527 and 416.927, reassess the claimant’s symptoms pursuant to
21
Social Security Ruling 16-3p, and reassess the claimant’s residual functional capacity pursuant to
22
20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1545 and 416.945 and Social Security Ruling 96-8p. The ALJ will obtain
23
vocational expert evidence and determine whether the vocational expert evidence is consistent
24
with the Dictionary of occupational Titles pursuant to Social Security Ruling 00-4p. The ALJ
25
will then make a de novo determination as to disability, and issue a new decision. Upon proper
26
application, Plaintiff will be entitled to attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28
ORDER OF REMAND
C17-0615-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
2
U.S.C. § 2412 et seq.
It is so ORDERED.
3
4
DATED this 19th day of September 2017.
A
5
6
7
John C. Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER OF REMAND
C17-0615-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?