McGlown v. Harper Lewis et al

Filing 6

ORDER denying plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with leave to amend within 30 days by Hon. James P. Donohue.(RS)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9

MEREDITH MCGLOWN,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12

v.

Case No. C17-618-RSM
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AND GRANTING
LEAVE TO AMEND

ANN HARPER LEWIS, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis

16

(“IFP”) in the above-entitled action, Dkt. 1. After careful consideration of the application,

17

proposed complaint, the governing law and the balance of the record, the Court ORDERS as

18

follows:

19

(1)

Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP, Dkt. 1, is DENIED. Plaintiff’s

20

application is deficient as she failed to sign the written consent for payment of costs from any

21

recovery. Dkt. 1 at 2.

22

(2)

Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND, and shall have 30 days from the

23

date of this Order to correct the deficiency. Plaintiff is advised that this case may be subject to

24

dismissal if she does not respond to this Order or fails to correct the deficiency.

25
26
ORDER
PAGE - 1

1
2
3

(3)

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the plaintiff, and to the

Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez.
DATED this 2nd day of May, 2017.

A

4
5

JAMES P. DONOHUE
Chief United States Magistrate Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER
PAGE - 2