Norman v. Berryhill
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. Based on the stipulation of the parties 14 , it is hereby ORDERED that this case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings and a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (AE)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
SEATTLE DIVISION
6
7
8
ALEX NORMAN,
Plaintiff,
9
Civil No. 2:17-CV-621- BAT
vs.
10
ORDER
11
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
12
Defendant.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Based on the stipulation of the parties (Dkt. 14), it is hereby ORDERED that the abovecaptioned case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings and a
de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the
Administrative Law Judge will further evaluate the opinion of Christine Yuodelis-Flores, M.D.
in accordance with 20 CFR 404.1527 and 416.927, and explain the weight given to such opinion
evidence; further evaluate the claimant’s maximum residual functional capacity and provide
appropriate rationale with specific references to evidence of record in support of the assessed
limitations; further evaluate the claimant’s alleged symptoms and provide rationale in
accordance with the disability regulations pertaining to evaluation of symptoms: and, if
warranted, obtain evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effects of the assessed
limitations on the claimant’s occupational base; and issue a new decision.
24
Page 1
ORDER - [2:17-CV-621-BAT]
1
Upon proper request to this Court, Plaintiff may be entitled to reasonable attorney fees,
2
expenses, and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
3
4
DATED this 20th day of September, 2017.
5
A
6
BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Page 2
ORDER - [2:17-CV-621-BAT]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?