Liu v. Kell
Filing
56
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #46 Stipulated Motion to Seal. The documents filed under seal (Dkt. Nos. 47-52) will remain sealed. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
LI LIU,
CASE NO. C17-0640-JCC
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
ORDER
v.
KEEGAN KELL,
13
Defendant.
14
15
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s unopposed motion to seal (Dkt. No.
16
46) certain exhibits (Dkt. Nos. 47–52) included with Defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion
17
for sanctions (Dkt. No. 44). Defendant filed these documents under seal because they contain
18
Plaintiff’s bank records and other personal financial information. (See Dkt. Nos. 47–52.)
19
The Court starts from the position that “[t]here is a strong presumption of public access to
20
[its] files.” W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 5(g)(3); see also Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435
21
U.S. 589, 597 (1978). However, documents filed in support of a dispositive motion should
22
remain under seal when a party can “articulate[] compelling reasons supported by specific
23
factual findings” that outweigh the public’s interest in access. Kamakana v. City & Cty. of
24
Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). The Court finds that Plaintiff’s need to keep her
25
personal financial records confidential is a compelling reason that outweighs the public’s interest
26
in access to the records.
ORDER
C17-0640-JCC
PAGE - 1
1
2
3
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to seal (Dkt. No. 46) is
GRANTED. The documents filed under seal (Dkt. Nos. 47–52) will remain sealed.
DATED this 7th day of February 2018.
A
4
5
6
John C. Coughenour
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER
C17-0640-JCC
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?