Damasco v. United States of America
Filing
6
ORDER granting 5 Stipulated Motion to extend initial scheduling dates; FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 7/13/2017, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/20/2017, Joint Status Report due by 7/27/2017, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9
10 EDITHA DAMASCO,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-641-RSM
v.
STIPULATED MOTION TO
EXTEND INITIAL SCHEDULING
DATES AND PROPOSED ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
14
Defendant(s).
15
16
JOINT STIPULATION
17
18
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Editha Damasco, through her attorney, David H.
19 Zielke, and Defendant, the United States of America, through its counsel, Tricia Boerger,
20
Assistant United States Attorney, in this stipulated motion to extend the initial scheduling
21
22 dates in this matter as follows:
23
24
Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference:
07/13/2017
Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1):
07/20/2017
Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery
Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local
Civil Rule 26(f):
07/27/2017
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Motion to Extend
Initial Scheduling Dates and
Proposed Order
2:17-cv-641-RSM - 1
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
(206) 553-7970
1
2
This extension is necessary because the United States was only recently served
and has not yet filed an answer or had adequate time to confer with the federal agency or
3
4 understand the facts or nature of the case sufficient to participate in a discovery
5 conference, submit initial disclosures or prepare a discovery plan. The United States’
6
answer is due on July 3, 2017. As such, the parties are requesting an extension of time
7
8
for the initial scheduling dates to allow them time to review the initial pleadings and
9 participate meaningfully in the FRCP 26 process.
10
The parties though their counsel further agree that neither party will be prejudiced
11
12 by this agreement.
13
DATED this 2nd day of June, 2017.
14
Respectfully submitted,
15
ANNETTE L. HAYES
United States Attorney
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
s/ David H. Zielke
DAVID H. ZIELKE, WSBA #36494
The Law Firm of David H. Zielke, PS
2122 112th Ave. NE, Suite A-300
Bellevue, WA 98004
Telephone: (425) 202-7743
Fax: (425) 202-7742
Email: david@zielkelawfirm.com
24
s/ Tricia Boerger
TRICIA BOERGER, WSBA #38581
Assistant United States Attorney
Western District of Washington
United States Attorney’s Office
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271
Phone: 206-553-7970
Email: tricia.boerger@usdoj.gov
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Motion to Extend
Initial Scheduling Dates and
Proposed Order
2:17-cv-641-RSM - 2
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
(206) 553-7970
1
2
ORDER
The Court, having reviewed the parties’ stipulated motion and the record in this
3
4 matter and being fully informed, finds good cause exists to extend the initial scheduling
5 dates as requested. Counsel for the United States has not yet filed an answer or had
6
sufficient time to review the case, such that neither party would be in a position to
7
8
meaningfully participate in the FRCP 26 process. As such, and the parties having so
9 stipulated and agreed, it is hereby ORDERED that the initial scheduling dates are
10
extended as follows:
11
12
Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference:
07/13/2017
13
Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1):
07/20/2017
Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery
Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) and Local
Civil Rule 26(f):
07/27/2017
14
15
16
17
18
DATED this 5th day of June, 2017.
19
20
22
A
23
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Motion to Extend
Initial Scheduling Dates and
Proposed Order
2:17-cv-641-RSM - 3
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
(206) 553-7970
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?