Smith v. Berryhill

Filing 11

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Extension of Time. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due December 11, 2017. Any reply is due December 15, 2017. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones.(TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 MATTHEW DAVID SMITH, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 11 Commissioner of Social Security, 12 13 Case No. C17-647-RAJ ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendant. Based on the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 10) and the declaration of 14 Amy Gilbrough it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due 15 December 11, 2017. Any reply is due December 15, 2017. 16 17 DATED this 5th day of December, 2017. 18 19 /s/Richard A. Jones RICHARD A. JONES United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?