Smith v. Berryhill

Filing 17

ORDER re parties' 16 Stipulated Motion to Remand. It is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 MATTHEW DAVID SMITH, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. Civil No. 2:17-CV-00647-RAJ 13 14 PROPOSED ORDER NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to offer the claimant an opportunity for a hearing, further develop the record and issue a new decision. Judgment will not issue. The Court will maintain jurisdiction over this case. 21 22 23 24 Following a sentence six remand, the Commissioner must return to the district court to file with the Court any such additional or modified findings of fact and decision, and, in any case in which the Commissioner has not made a fully favorable decision to the individual, a transcript of the additional record and testimony upon which her action in modifying or affirming was Page 1 ORDER 1 based. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); see also Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98 n.1 (1991). Plaintiff 2 may seek judicial review of a decision not fully favorable by reinstating this case rather than by 3 filing a new Complaint. 4 5 DATED this 18th day of April, 2018. 6 7 A 8 9 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Page 2 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?