Smith v. Berryhill
Filing
17
ORDER re parties' 16 Stipulated Motion to Remand. It is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
MATTHEW DAVID SMITH,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
Civil No. 2:17-CV-00647-RAJ
13
14
PROPOSED ORDER
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations,
performing the duties and functions not reserved
to the Commissioner of Social Security,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned
case be REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence six of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to
offer the claimant an opportunity for a hearing, further develop the record and issue a new
decision. Judgment will not issue. The Court will maintain jurisdiction over this case.
21
22
23
24
Following a sentence six remand, the Commissioner must return to the district court to
file with the Court any such additional or modified findings of fact and decision, and, in any case
in which the Commissioner has not made a fully favorable decision to the individual, a transcript
of the additional record and testimony upon which her action in modifying or affirming was
Page 1
ORDER
1
based. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); see also Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98 n.1 (1991). Plaintiff
2
may seek judicial review of a decision not fully favorable by reinstating this case rather than by
3
filing a new Complaint.
4
5
DATED this 18th day of April, 2018.
6
7
A
8
9
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Page 2
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?