Smith v. Berryhill
Filing
7
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's Response to the Motion to Dismiss due 11/6/2017; Reply (if any) due 11/10/2017. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
MATTHEW DAVID SMITH,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
11 Commissioner of Social Security,
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME
Defendant.
12
13
Case No. C17-647-RAJ
Based on the motion to amend and the declaration of Amy Gilbrough it is hereby ordered
14 that Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due November 6, 2017. Any reply is due
15 November 10, 2017.
16
DATED this 6th day of October, 2017.
17
18
/s/Richard A. Jones
RICHARD A. JONES
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?