Smith v. Berryhill

Filing 7

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's Response to the Motion to Dismiss due 11/6/2017; Reply (if any) due 11/10/2017. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 MATTHEW DAVID SMITH, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 11 Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendant. 12 13 Case No. C17-647-RAJ Based on the motion to amend and the declaration of Amy Gilbrough it is hereby ordered 14 that Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due November 6, 2017. Any reply is due 15 November 10, 2017. 16 DATED this 6th day of October, 2017. 17 18 /s/Richard A. Jones RICHARD A. JONES United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?