Smith v. Berryhill

Filing 9

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due December 4, 2017. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 MATTHEW DAVID SMITH, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 11 Commissioner of Social Security, 12 13 Case No. C17-647-RAJ ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendant. Based on the unopposed motion to amend (Dkt. 8) and the declaration of Amy Gilbrough 14 it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due December 4, 2017. 15 Any reply is due December 8, 2017. 16 DATED this 7th day of November, 2017. 17 18 /s/Richard A. Jones RICHARD A. JONES United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?