Smith v. Berryhill
Filing
9
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due December 4, 2017. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
MATTHEW DAVID SMITH,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
11 Commissioner of Social Security,
12
13
Case No. C17-647-RAJ
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME
Defendant.
Based on the unopposed motion to amend (Dkt. 8) and the declaration of Amy Gilbrough
14 it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due December 4, 2017.
15 Any reply is due December 8, 2017.
16
DATED this 7th day of November, 2017.
17
18
/s/Richard A. Jones
RICHARD A. JONES
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?