Durden v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company

Filing 31

MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiff's 24 Motion to Supplement Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 LEO DURDEN, 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, C17-651 TSZ v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, MINUTE ORDER Defendant. 11 12 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 13 (1) Plaintiff’s motion, docket no. 24, to supplement his response to defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Although plaintiff’s motion to supplement was improperly noted for the day after it was filed, defendant filed a substantive response within the time that would have been allowed if plaintiff’s motion had been properly noted, and the Court therefore declines to strike plaintiff’s motion to supplement. The supplemental materials submitted by plaintiff, namely the report of Robert B. Dietz and related documents, will be considered by the Court in deciding defendant’s motion for summary judgment, along with defendant’s objections to, and request to strike, such evidence. 14 15 16 17 18 19 (2) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of Dated this 12th day of February, 2018. 20 William M. McCool Clerk 21 22 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?