Durden v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company
Filing
31
MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiff's 24 Motion to Supplement Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
LEO DURDEN,
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
C17-651 TSZ
v.
GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
MINUTE ORDER
Defendant.
11
12
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
13
(1)
Plaintiff’s motion, docket no. 24, to supplement his response to defendant’s
motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Although plaintiff’s motion to supplement
was improperly noted for the day after it was filed, defendant filed a substantive response
within the time that would have been allowed if plaintiff’s motion had been properly
noted, and the Court therefore declines to strike plaintiff’s motion to supplement. The
supplemental materials submitted by plaintiff, namely the report of Robert B. Dietz and
related documents, will be considered by the Court in deciding defendant’s motion for
summary judgment, along with defendant’s objections to, and request to strike, such
evidence.
14
15
16
17
18
19
(2)
record.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
Dated this 12th day of February, 2018.
20
William M. McCool
Clerk
21
22
s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?