Alexander v. King County, Washington et al
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Stipulated Motion to extend deadlines for FRCP 26(f) conf, initial disclosures and combined joint status report and discovery plan by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
REBECCA ALEXANDER, a single woman
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
NO. 2:17-cv-00653-RSM
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED JOINT
MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR
FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL
DISCLOSURES, AND COMBINED JOINT
STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY
PLAN
v.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a county
municipality; STATE OF WASHINGTON,
one of the fifty states of the United States;
Bank of America, N.A., a national banking
association; NORTHWEST TRUSTEE
SERVICES, INC., A Washington
Corporation; U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Harborview
Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-12, Mortgage
Loan Pass-through Certificates, Series
2005-12 Trust; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,
LLC, a foreign entity, JOHN DOE TRUSTEE;
JOHN DOE TRUST; MERS, a foreign
corporation;
Defendants.
20
21
THIS MATTER has come before the undersigned Judge on the parties’ Stipulated Joint
22
Motion to Extend Deadlines for FRCP 26(F) Conference, Initial Disclosures, and Combined
23
Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan. The Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully
24
advised, now therefore the Court GRANTS the Motion. It is so ordered that if the Court’s
25
resolution of the Motion to Remand and Nationstar, U.S. Bank, and MERS’ Motion to Dismiss
26
Plaintiff’s Complaint, that are scheduled to be heard June 2, 2017, and June 9, 2017,
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINES
[PROPOSED]
2:17-cv-00653
1
Error! AutoText entry not defined.
1
respectively, result in the Court retaining the case, the deadlines for the FRCP 26(f)
2
Conference, Initial Disclosures, and Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan will be:
3
FRCP 26(f) Conference: 7 days after resolution of the motions.
4
Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1): 7 days after FRCP 26(f)
Conference.
Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan: 7 days after Initial
Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1).
5
6
7
DATED this 1st day of June 2017.
8
A
9
10
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINES
[PROPOSED]
2:17-cv-00653
2
Error! AutoText entry not defined.
1
Presented by:
2
ROBERT W. FERGUSON
Attorney General
STAFNE LAW FIRM
/s/ Leslie R. Seffern
LESLIE R. SEFFERN, WSBA #19503
Assistant Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendant State of Washington
P O. Box 40126
Olympia, WA 98504-0126
LeslieS@atg.wa.gov
/s/ Scott E. Stafne
SCOTT E. STAFNE, WSBA #6964
Attorney at Law
239 N Olympic Avenue
Arlington, WA 98223
Scott@stafnelawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
3
4
5
6
7
8
DANIEL T. SATTERBERG
King County Prosecuting Attorney
ANGLIN FLEWELLING RASMUSSEN
CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP
/s/ John Briggs
JOHN BRIGGS, WSBA #24301
MACKENZIE BROWN, WSBA#49598
Attorneys at Law
516 3rd Avenue
Room W400
Seattle, WA 98104-2388
John.Briggs@kingcounty.gov
Mackenzie.Brown@kingcounty.gov
Attorneys for Defendant King County
/s/ Adam G. Hughes
ADAM G. HUGHES, WSBA #34438
Attorney at Law
701 Pike Street
Suite 1560
Seattle, WA 98101
AHughes@afrct.com
Attorney for Defendants U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee for Harborview
Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-12, Mortgage Loan
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-12 Trust;
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, and MERS
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
RCO LEGAL, P.S.
16
17
18
19
20
/s/ Joshua Schaer
JOSHUA SCHAER, WSBA #31491
Attorney at Law
13555 SE 36th Street
Suite 300
Bellevue, WA 98006
JSchaer@rcolegal.com
Attorney for Defendant Northwest Trustee Services,
Inc.
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINES
[PROPOSED]
2:17-cv-00653
3
Error! AutoText entry not defined.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?