Jones v. Slade et al

Filing 11

ORDER denying the parties' 10 stipulated motion for protective order without prejudice to re-filing in a manner that comports with the court's local rules. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

CAROL JONES,

CASE NO. C17-0680JLR
Plaintiff,

11
v.
12
13

TODD SLADE, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

ORDER DENYING JOINT
MOTION FOR STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Before the court is the parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order. (Stip. Mot.

16

(Dkt. # 10).) The parties, however, fail to comply with Local Rule LCR 26(c)(2). See

17

Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 26(c)(2). Pursuant to this rule, “[p]arties are encouraged

18

to use this district’s model protective order, available on the court’s website,” but those

19

“[p]arties that wish to depart from the model order must provide the court with a redlined

20

version identifying departures from the model.” Id. Here, the parties appear to use the

21

model protective order as a basis for their filing, but they fail to provide the court a

22

redlined version as required under the local rules. Accordingly, the court DENIES the

ORDER - 1

1

parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order (Dkt. # 10), but without prejudice to re-

2

filing in a manner that comports with the court’s local rules.

3

Dated this 10th day of October, 2017.

4
5

A

6

JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER - 2