Jones v. Slade et al

Filing 11

ORDER denying the parties' 10 stipulated motion for protective order without prejudice to re-filing in a manner that comports with the court's local rules. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 CAROL JONES, CASE NO. C17-0680JLR Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 TODD SLADE, et al., Defendants. 14 15 ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION FOR STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE Before the court is the parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order. (Stip. Mot. 16 (Dkt. # 10).) The parties, however, fail to comply with Local Rule LCR 26(c)(2). See 17 Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 26(c)(2). Pursuant to this rule, “[p]arties are encouraged 18 to use this district’s model protective order, available on the court’s website,” but those 19 “[p]arties that wish to depart from the model order must provide the court with a redlined 20 version identifying departures from the model.” Id. Here, the parties appear to use the 21 model protective order as a basis for their filing, but they fail to provide the court a 22 redlined version as required under the local rules. Accordingly, the court DENIES the ORDER - 1 1 parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order (Dkt. # 10), but without prejudice to re- 2 filing in a manner that comports with the court’s local rules. 3 Dated this 10th day of October, 2017. 4 5 A 6 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?