Mix v. Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
Filing
22
ORDER striking Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
WILLIAM MIX,
CASE NO. C17-0699JLR
Plaintiff,
11
ORDER STRIKING MOTION
v.
12
13
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Defendant.
14
15
On June 30, 2017, Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, filed a motion to
16
dismiss Plaintiff William Mix’s complaint and noted the motion for July 28, 2017. (See
17
MTD (Dkt. # 14).) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), Mr. Mix
18
amended his complaint on July 20, 2017. (FAC (Dkt. # 18)); Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B).
19
On July 24, 2017, the court ordered Ocwen to show cause why the pending motion to
20
21
dismiss, which was based on Mr. Mix’s original complaint, was not moot. (See 7/24/17
Order (Dkt. # 19).) The next day, Ocwen responded to the court’s order by requesting
22
ORDER - 1
1
that the court strike the motion to dismiss. (OSC Resp. (Dkt. # 21) at 2.) In his response
2
to Ocwen’s motion to dismiss, Mr. Mix agrees that the motion is moot. (See MTD Resp.
3
(Dkt. # 20) at 2.) For these reasons, the court STRIKES Ocwen’s motion to dismiss (Dkt.
4
# 14).
5
Dated this 25th day of July, 2017.
6
7
A
8
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?