Norval v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion to withdraw as counsel. Attorney Karolyn Ann Hicks is terminated as counsel for Interpleader Counter-Defendant Janine Haug. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Janine Haug via the USPS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
SALLY NORVAL,
CASE NO. C17-0704JLR
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
ORDER GRANTING AMENDED
MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS
COUNSEL
METROPOLITAN LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
Before the court is Karolyn Hicks’s amended motion to withdraw as counsel for
16
Interpleader Counter-Defendant Janine Haug. (Am. Mot. (Dkt. # 23).) Local Civil Rule
17
83.2(b)(1) provides that unless there is a change of counsel within the same law firm, an
18
attorney may withdraw from representation only by leave of court. Local Rules W.D.
19
Wash. LCR 83.2(b)(1). “Leave shall be obtained by filing a motion or a stipulation and
20
proposed order for withdrawal . . . .” Id. The court will ordinarily permit an attorney to
21
withdraw until 60 days before the discovery cut-off. Id. A motion for withdrawal “shall
22
ORDER - 1
1
include a certification that the motion was served on the client and opposing counsel.”
2
Id. In addition, if the attorney’s withdrawal will leave a party unrepresented, the motion
3
must include that party’s address and telephone number. Id.
4
Ms. Hicks and the firm Stokes Lawrence, P.S. move to withdraw as counsel of
5
record for Ms. Haug. (See Am. Mot. at 1.) Because the amended motion complies with
6
the requirements for attorney withdrawal set forth in Local Civil Rule 83.2(b), the court
7
GRANTS the amended motion to withdraw (Dkt. # 23).
8
Dated this 8th day of September, 2017.
9
10
A
11
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?