Sea Shepherd Legal v. Department of the Navy
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL dismissing case with prejudice signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
9
10 SEA SHEPHERD LEGAL,
11
12
13
Case No. C17-0720 RSM
Plaintiff,
STIPULATED ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL
v.
14 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
15
Defendant.
16
17
The above-captioned action against the United States having been settled through
18 an agreement executed on January 11, 2018, the parties, through their undersigned
19 counsel and respective attorneys of record, now hereby stipulate to the dismissal with
20 prejudice of the above-captioned action.
21
22
Respectfully submitted, DATED this 16th day of January, 2018.
23
24
s/ Brett W. Sommermeyer
s/ Nicholas A. Fromherz
BRETT W. SOMMERMEYER, WSBA # 30003
NICHOLAS A. FROMHERZ pro hac vice, CA BAR #
248218
SEA SHEPHERD LEGAL
226 Eastlake Avenue East, No. 108
Seattle, WA 98102
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
C17-0720 RSM - 1
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
(206) 553-7970
1
Phone: 206-453-0012
Email: brett@seashepherdlegal.org
Email: nick@seashepherdlegal.org
2
3
4
s/ Kayla Stahman_______________
KAYLA C. STAHMAN, CABA #228931
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271
Phone: 206-553-7970
Fax: 206-553-4067
Email: kayla.stahman@usdoj.gov
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ORDER
12
13
Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this case is
14 DISMISSED with prejudice.
15
16
Dated this 17th day of January 2018.
17
A
18
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
C17-0720 RSM - 2
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
(206) 553-7970
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?