Sanders v. United States of America

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 Report and Recommendations Entered by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. The Court, hereby finds and ORDERS: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. (2) Petitio ners petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1) and this action are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. (3) Petitioners application to proceed with this action in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 6) is STRICKEN as moot. (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and the Honorable James P. Donohue.(SG)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 CHRISTOPHER SANDERS, 10 Petitioner, v. 11 12 CASE NO. C17-0729-JCC ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 Respondent. 14 15 The Court, having reviewed Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Report 16 and Recommendation of James P. Donohue, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, and the 17 remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS: 18 (1) The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 7) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 19 (2) Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1) and this action are 20 21 22 DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. (3) Petitioner’s application to proceed with this action in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 6) is STRICKEN as moot. 23 (3) 24 James P. Donohue. 25 // 26 The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and the Honorable // ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAGE - 1 1 DATED this 25th day of July 2017. A 2 3 4 John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?