Christopher v. Ford Motor Company Inc et al
Filing
83
ORDER denying as moot plaintiff's #73 Application for Extension of Time to Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
CARREA CHRISTOPHER,
Plaintiff,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 2:17-CV-738-RSL
ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE MOTION TO COMPEL
DISCOVERY
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Carrea Christopher’s “Application for
16 Extension of Time to Motion to Compel Discovery.” Dkt. #73. Plaintiff states that defendant has
17 asked for additional time to submit responses to his discovery requests. Id. at 1. He represents
18 that he “will provide the additional time until January 18, 2019, but will file [a] motion by
19 January 31, 2019.” Id. at 2. No motion to compel has been filed.
20
21
22
23
24
25
As defendant points out, there was no Case Scheduling Order entered at the time plaintiff
filed this motion on January 14, 2019. Dkt. #76 at 1. There were no discovery deadlines in place
in regard to which plaintiff needed to request an extension. A Case Scheduling Order has since
been issued, setting a deadline of October 6, 2019 for the completion of discovery. Dkt. #82.
For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff’s motion is DENIED as moot.
26
27
28
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY - 1
1
DATED this 6th day of March, 2019.
2
3
4
A
Robert S. Lasnik
5
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?