UN4 Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al

Filing 124

ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 122 Motion to Compel Discoveryand for Sanctions Against Mortedha Al-Sultan. Defendant Al-Sultan shall, on or before November 30, 2018, provide full and complete responses to Interrogatories Nos. 1 and 4-22 and to Requests for Production Nos. 7, 8, 11, 12, and 13. Plaintiff is entitled to an award of expenses. Plaintiff shall, on or before November 9th, provide a statement of the reasonable attorney's fees related to the filing of this motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to note a "Fee Petition" on the Court's calendar for Friday, November 16, 2018. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH) (cc: Defendant Mortedha Al-Sultan via first class mail)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 UN4 PRODUCTIONS, INC., 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff, v. MADISON PALMER, et al., Defendants. Case No. C17-0785RSL ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel Discovery 14 and for Sanctions Against Mortedha Al-Sultan.” Dkt. # 122. Plaintiff served written 15 discovery on defendant Al-Sultan on June 14, 2018. Despite multiple communications 16 from plaintiff regarding the need to participate in discovery, defendant has not responded. 17 Having reviewed the interrogatories, the requests for production, and the remainder of the 18 record, the Court finds as follows: 19 1) Defendant Al-Sultan is a defendant in a federal lawsuit and must take his 20 obligations as a litigant seriously. Participating fully and completely in discovery is one 21 of those obligations. 22 2) Nevertheless, a number of the discovery requests propounded by plaintiff are 23 unduly burdensome, of minimal relevance, related to claims that the Ninth Circuit has 24 found are not viable, and/or seek private and confidential information that need not be 25 produced unless and until an appropriate protective order is in place. Defendant will not 26 ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES - 1 1 2 be compelled to respond to those inquiries. 3) Defendant Al-Sultan shall, on or before November 30, 2018, provide full and 3 complete responses to Interrogatories Nos. 1 and 4-22 and to Requests for Production 4 Nos. 7, 8, 11, 12, and 13. Defendant has an obligation to take reasonable steps to inform 5 himself regarding the subjects into which plaintiff has inquired. If, after reasonable 6 investigation, he does not know the answer to a particular discovery request, he may 7 respond “I do not know.” 8 9 4) Plaintiff is entitled to an award of expenses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5)(a). Plaintiff shall, on or before November 9th, provide a statement of the reasonable 10 attorney’s fees related to the filing of this motion. Costs associated with the underlying 11 discovery requests and meet and confer efforts are not recoverable. The Clerk of Court is 12 directed to note a “Fee Petition” on the Court’s calendar for Friday, November 16, 2018. 13 Any opposition to the fee petition is due on or before the note date. 14 15 Dated this 24th day of October, 2018. 16 A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?