Kim et al v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB

Filing 8

ORDER dismissing this matter without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a cognizable claim, signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 STEVE J. KIM and EUN SUN KIM, 8 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, C17-797 TSZ v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, ORDER Defendant. 12 13 By Minute Order entered May 31, 2017, docket no. 4, the Court directed plaintiffs 14 to show cause by June 9, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of 15 subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiffs were directed 16 to file, along with any response to the Minute Order, copies of the order granting 17 summary judgment, the judgment, and the order for sale entered in King County Superior 18 Court Cause No. 14-2-29709-2 KNT. Plaintiffs did not timely file any response to the 19 Minute Order. Instead, they filed an amended complaint, docket no. 7, which is not 20 substantially different from the original complaint, and which continues to seek relief that 21 is in the nature of appellate review over a state court judgment. See Reusser v. Wachovia 22 Bank, N.A., 525 F.3d 855 (9th Cir. 2008) (observing that a federal action constitutes a 23 ORDER - 1 1 de facto appeal from a state court judgment, which is precluded by the Rooker-Feldman 2 doctrine, when the claims raised are “inextricably intertwined” with the state court’s 3 decision). Given plaintiffs’ lack of response, this matter is hereby DISMISSED without 4 prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a cognizable claim. 5 The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to 6 CLOSE this case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated this 28th day of June, 2017. 9 A 10 11 Thomas S. Zilly United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?