Moore v. The Boeing Company et al
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 55 Stipulated Motion to Amend. The Order entered August 29, 2018, docket no. 53 , is AMENDED as follows. (See Minute Order for details). Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
THE BOEING COMPANY, et al.,
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
10 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
The parties’ stipulated motion, docket no. 55, is GRANTED as follows.
The Order entered August 29, 2018, docket no. 53, is AMENDED as follows. The
12 location of the mental examination to be conducted by Gerald Rosen, Ph.D. on October 8
and 11, 2018, shall be a place on which the parties mutually agree. 1 Dr. Rosen need not
13 administer to plaintiff the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2, and may use
any psychological instruments or tests that are accepted within the field and appropriate
14 in this matter.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
Dated this 24th day of September, 2018.
William M. McCool
The Order dated August 29, 2018, docket no. 53, specifies that the mental examination shall occur at
21 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 5150, in Seattle, which is the office for defendant’s counsel Ogletree, Deakins,
Nash, Smoak, & Stewart, P.C. The proposed order submitted with the parties’ stipulated motion, docket
no. 55-1, suggests that the mental examination take place at 600 University Street, Suite 320, in Seattle,
22 which is the office of Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLC. The parties, however, did not discuss the
change in location in their stipulated motion, and thus, the Court simply strikes from the previous order
23 the direction that the mental examination be conducted in defendant’s counsel’s office.
MINUTE ORDER - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?