Jama v. Jones

Filing 8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 MAHAMED A. JAMA, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 No. C17-807RSL v. RICHARD JONES, ORDER OF DISMISSAL Defendant. On or about June 1, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to amend his complaint to remedy his initial failure to allege facts sufficient to give rise to a plausible claim for relief. Dkt. # 6. Plaintiff has not responded. The Court, having reviewed the record as a whole under the standards articulated in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and having construed the allegations of the complaint liberally, see Bernhardt v. Los Angeles County, 339 F.3d 920, 925 (9th Cir. 2003), finds that plaintiff’s complaint does not state a cognizable statutory or constitutional claim and accordingly must be dismissed. 21 22 23 24 The above-captioned matter is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 27th day of June, 2017. A 25 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 26 27 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?