Jama v. Jones

Filing 8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9

MAHAMED A. JAMA,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

No. C17-807RSL
v.
RICHARD JONES,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Defendant.

On or about June 1, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to amend his complaint to remedy his
initial failure to allege facts sufficient to give rise to a plausible claim for relief. Dkt. # 6.
Plaintiff has not responded. The Court, having reviewed the record as a whole under the
standards articulated in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and having construed the allegations of the
complaint liberally, see Bernhardt v. Los Angeles County, 339 F.3d 920, 925 (9th Cir. 2003),
finds that plaintiff’s complaint does not state a cognizable statutory or constitutional claim and
accordingly must be dismissed.

21
22
23
24

The above-captioned matter is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of
Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
DATED this 27th day of June, 2017.

A

25

Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

26
27
28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1