Harris v. Harig et al
Filing
13
MINUTE ORDER striking defendants' Notice 12 by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS) cc plaintiff
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
4
5
6
CURTIS RAY HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
7
8
v.
Case No. C17-813RSM
MINUTE ORDER
9
10
DON HARIG, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
13
14
15
The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge:
16
On September 15, 2017, Defendants filed a “Notice – Warning to Plaintiff.” Dkt. #12.
17
This Notice indicates that “defendants have made a motion for summary judgment,” and
18
19
20
advises Plaintiff as to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Id.
However,
Defendants have not filed a motion for summary judgment in this case. Instead, Defendants
21
have filed a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. #10.
22
Defendants’ Notice could easily cause confusion for Plaintiff.
23
24
25
Accordingly, the Court
STRIKES Defendants’ Notice, Dkt #12, and advises the parties to disregard its contents.
DATED this 18 day of September, 2017.
26
WILLIAM McCOOL, Clerk
27
By:
28
MINUTE ORDER - 1
/s/ Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?