Harris v. Harig et al

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING IFP REQUEST by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS) cc plaintiff

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 CURTIS RAY HARRIS, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 CASE NO. C17-0813-RSM v. ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS REQUEST DON HARIG, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 On May 24, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). 15 Dkt. #1. On May 30, 2017, the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion be denied and that Plaintiff be 17 required to pay the filing fee. Dkt. #2. Objections to that R&R were not due until June 13, 2017. 18 However, on June 6, 2017, Plaintiff paid the filing fee, rendering Plaintiff’s IFP Motion moot. 19 The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), the 20 Report and Recommendation of Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, and the 21 remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER: 22 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; 23 (2) Plaintiff’s IFP application is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS REQUEST PAGE - 1 1 (3) The Clerk shall file the complaint. 2 (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Honorable 3 4 Mary Alice Theiler. DATED this 7 day of June 2017. 5 A 6 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS REQUEST PAGE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?