Harris v. Harig et al
Filing
5
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING IFP REQUEST by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS) cc plaintiff
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
CURTIS RAY HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
CASE NO. C17-0813-RSM
v.
ORDER DENYING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS REQUEST
DON HARIG, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
On May 24, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).
15
Dkt. #1.
On May 30, 2017, the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler issued a Report and
16
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion be denied and that Plaintiff be
17
required to pay the filing fee. Dkt. #2. Objections to that R&R were not due until June 13, 2017.
18
However, on June 6, 2017, Plaintiff paid the filing fee, rendering Plaintiff’s IFP Motion moot.
19
The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), the
20
Report and Recommendation of Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, and the
21
remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:
22
(1)
The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
23
(2)
Plaintiff’s IFP application is DENIED AS MOOT.
ORDER DENYING IN
FORMA PAUPERIS REQUEST
PAGE - 1
1
(3)
The Clerk shall file the complaint.
2
(4)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Honorable
3
4
Mary Alice Theiler.
DATED this 7 day of June 2017.
5
A
6
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER DENYING IN
FORMA PAUPERIS REQUEST
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?