Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., et al
ORDER denying parties' 62 Stipulated Motion for Protective Order, but without prejudice to re-filing in a manner that comports with the court's local rules. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC.,
CASE NO. C17-0814JLR
ORDER DENYING STIPULATED
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE
SERVICES, INC., et al.,
Before the court is the parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order. (Stip. Mot.
(Dkt. # 66).) The parties, however, fail to comply with Local Rule LCR 26(c)(2). See
Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 26(c)(2). Pursuant to this rule, “[p]arties are encouraged
to use this district’s model protective order, available on the court’s website,” but those
“[p]arties that wish to depart from the model order must provide the court with a redlined
version identifying departures from the model.” Id. Here, the parties appear to use the
model protective order as a basis for their filing, but they fail to provide the court a
ORDER - 1
redlined version as required under the local rules. Accordingly, the court DENIES the
parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order (Dkt. # 66), but without prejudice to
re-filing in a manner that comports with the court’s local rules.
Dated this 27th day of December, 2017.
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?