Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., et al

Filing 82

MINUTE ORDER setting Oral Argument on Non-Party Estes Express Line's 58 MOTION to Quash and on Defendant Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.'s 62 MOTION for Protective Order. Motion Hearing set for 3/21/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge James L. Robart. Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., Plaintiff, 11 CASE NO. C17-0814JLR MINUTE ORDER v. 12 13 AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable 16 James L. Robart: 17 Before the court are Non-Party Estes Express Lines’s (“Estes”) motion to quash 18 (MTQ (Dkt. # 58)) and Defendant Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.’s (“Amazon”) 19 motion for a protective order (MFPO (Dkt. # 62)), both of which seek to quash Plaintiff 20 Central Freight Lines, Inc.’s (“Central Freight”) subpoena to several non-party motor 21 carriers (see MTQ at 1; MFPO at 1). Another non-party to whom the subpoena is 22 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 directed —ABF Freight System, Inc. (“ABF”)—joins in Estes’s motion to quash. 2 (Joinder (Dkt. # 60).) The court ORDERS a hearing on the motions for Wednesday, 3 March 21, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. The court further ORDERS Central Freight and Amazon to 4 appear in person and Estes and ABF to appear in person or telephonically. Any other 5 non-party subject to the subpoena may—but is not required to—participate in the hearing 6 in person or telephonically. Any non-party that wishes to participate telephonically must 7 contact the Courtroom Deputy for instructions on making such an appearance. 8 Filed and entered this 13th day of March, 2018. 9 WILLIAM M. MCCOOL Clerk of Court 10 s/ Ashleigh Drecktrah Deputy Clerk 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?