Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., et al
Filing
82
MINUTE ORDER setting Oral Argument on Non-Party Estes Express Line's 58 MOTION to Quash and on Defendant Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.'s 62 MOTION for Protective Order. Motion Hearing set for 3/21/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge James L. Robart. Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
11
CASE NO. C17-0814JLR
MINUTE ORDER
v.
12
13
AMAZON FULFILLMENT
SERVICES, INC., et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable
16
James L. Robart:
17
Before the court are Non-Party Estes Express Lines’s (“Estes”) motion to quash
18
(MTQ (Dkt. # 58)) and Defendant Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.’s (“Amazon”)
19
motion for a protective order (MFPO (Dkt. # 62)), both of which seek to quash Plaintiff
20
Central Freight Lines, Inc.’s (“Central Freight”) subpoena to several non-party motor
21
carriers (see MTQ at 1; MFPO at 1). Another non-party to whom the subpoena is
22
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
directed —ABF Freight System, Inc. (“ABF”)—joins in Estes’s motion to quash.
2
(Joinder (Dkt. # 60).) The court ORDERS a hearing on the motions for Wednesday,
3
March 21, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. The court further ORDERS Central Freight and Amazon to
4
appear in person and Estes and ABF to appear in person or telephonically. Any other
5
non-party subject to the subpoena may—but is not required to—participate in the hearing
6
in person or telephonically. Any non-party that wishes to participate telephonically must
7
contact the Courtroom Deputy for instructions on making such an appearance.
8
Filed and entered this 13th day of March, 2018.
9
WILLIAM M. MCCOOL
Clerk of Court
10
s/ Ashleigh Drecktrah
Deputy Clerk
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?