Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., et al
Filing
85
ORDER granting attorney David W. Smith's 83 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice and Waiver of Local Counsel Requirement on behalf of non-party Estes Express Lines. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(PM) cc: David Smith via ECF ad hoc, Judge Robart, Attorney Admissions Clerk
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
8
CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC.,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
12
LIMITED FULFILLMENT SERVICES,
INC., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
)
) CASE NO. C17-0814JLR
)
)
) MINUTE ORDER GRANTING WAIVER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge:
17
On March 20, 2018, attorney David W. Smith, filed an application for leave to appear pro
18
19
hac vice on behalf of non-party Estes Express Lines. Dkt. #83. Mr. Smith seeks to appear for
20
this non-party for the limited purpose of moving to quash a subpoena. Id. Accordingly, Mr.
21
Smith seeks a waiver of the local counsel requirement as it would be expensive and inefficient
22
to hire multiple counsel for that limited purpose. Id. The Court agrees with Mr. Smith for the
23
reasons he sets forth. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Mr. Smith’s request for a waiver of the
24
25
local counsel requirement and will allow him to appear pro hac vice without associating local
26
counsel.
27
28
MINUTE ORDER
PAGE - 1
1
Mr. Smith is reminded that he is expected to be familiar with and follow the Court’s Local
2
Rules and any specific rules and orders of the presiding judge in this matter, the Honorable James
3
L. Robart.
4
The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Mr. Smith, Judge Robart and to all appearing
5
counsel.
6
7
DATED this 21st
day of March, 2018.
8
WILLIAM McCOOL, Clerk
9
By:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MINUTE ORDER
PAGE - 2
/s/ Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?