Top Notch Solutions, Inc. et al v. Crouse and Associates Insurance Brokers, Inc. et al
MINUTE ORDER granting Jack Lovejoy and Lawrence Cook's 60 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney; Pucin & Freidland, PC shall arrange for a substitute attorney to appear on its behalf on or before 2/28/2018; Messrs. Lovejoy and Cock are directed to s erve a copy of this Minute Order on Pucin and Freidland, PC and file proof of service within three (3) days of the date of this Minute Order. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) (Attorney Lawrence Ronald Cock and Jack Lovejoy terminated) (cc: Pucin & Freidland via USPS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
TOP NOTCH SOLUTIONS, INC.,
CROUSE AND ASSOCIATES
INSURANCE BROKERS, INC., et al.,
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
The unopposed motion, docket no. 60, brought by Jack M. Lovejoy and
Lawrence R. Cock, formerly of Cable, Langenbach, Kinerk & Bauer, LLP, and now with
CFL Law Group, LLP, to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant Pucin &
Freidland, P.C., is GRANTED. Messrs. Lovejoy and Cock are granted leave to
withdraw, effective immediately. Pucin & Freidland, P.C. shall arrange for a substitute
attorney to appear on its behalf on or before February 28, 2018. Pucin & Freidland, P.C.
is advised that failure to arrange for timely appearance by an attorney authorized to
practice before this Court might result in entry of default against it. See Local Civil
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
record. Messrs. Lovejoy and Cock are DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Minute Order
on Pucin & Freidland, P.C. and to file proof of service within three (3) days of the date of
this Minute Order.
Dated this 12th day of February, 2018.
William M. McCool
MINUTE ORDER - 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?