Gounder et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al

Filing 11

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 KAMLAWANTI GOUNDER a/k/a KALMA GOUNER, individually, and the marital community composed of KAMLAWANTI GOUNDER and JOHN DOE GOUNDER, 12 STIPULATED AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, 13 No. C17-846 RSM v. 14 15 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association; and DOES 1-10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1. RECITALS Plaintiff Kamlawanti Gounder and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) agree that discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following stipulated protective order. The parties acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with Local Civil Rule 26(c). It does not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential information under seal. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 1 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 2 2. PURPOSES The parties to this stipulation agree that they possess confidential and/or proprietary 3 business records and other confidential and/or proprietary information. Discovery in this action 4 is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which 5 special protection may be warranted. In order to address and protect the confidential and/or 6 proprietary nature of certain documents produced, the parties agree to limit the disclosure and 7 use of designated confidential and/or proprietary information for use in this litigation only. 8 9 The United States Supreme Court recognizes that an entity’s interest in protecting trade secrets and other confidential and proprietary information can overcome the public interest in 10 access to court records, sufficient to support the sealing of targeted court documents. As the 11 U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged, the courts may deny public access to judicial documents 12 where such records constitute “sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s 13 competitive standing.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978) (noting 14 that “courts have refused to permit their files to serve as . . . sources of business information 15 that might harm a litigant’s competitive standing”) (citations omitted); see also Bite Tech, Inc. 16 v. X2 Biosystems, Inc., 2013 WL 1399349, at *2 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 5, 2013) (granting a motion 17 to seal where the information could be used to predict a company’s future business plans). 18 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and request the court to enter the following 19 Stipulated Protective Order to govern the production and handling of documents and things, 20 answers to discovery requests, exhibits and other information produced or provided by the 21 parties or non-parties in the above entitled action. This includes materials that are produced 22 pursuant to discovery requests, notices of deposition, depositions upon written questions, 23 interrogatories, subpoenas or voluntary exchanges. The parties acknowledge that this 24 agreement is consistent with FRCP 26(c). It does not confer blanket protection on all 25 disclosures or responses to discovery—the protection it affords from public disclosure and use 26 extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under 27 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 2 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential 2 information under seal. 3 3. “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL “Confidential” material shall include the following documents and tangible things 4 5 produced or otherwise exchanged: (a) personnel and payroll information; (b) financial 6 information including those of third parties; (c) commercially sensitive or personally sensitive 7 information of a non-public nature; (d) confidential business records, including proprietary and 8 other trade secret information; and (e) medical records. 9 4. SCOPE The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as 10 11 defined herein), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) 12 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, 13 conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential 14 material. However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that 15 is in the public domain or becomes part of the public domain. 16 5. 17 ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 5.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is 18 disclosed or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for 19 prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be 20 disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this 21 agreement. Confidential material must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a 22 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized 23 under this agreement. 24 5.2 Disclosure of Confidential Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by 25 the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any 26 confidential material only to: 27 (a) the receiving party’s counsel of record in this action, as well as STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 3 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 employees of counsel and its firm to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the 2 information for this litigation; (b) 3 experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for 4 this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 5 (Exhibit A); 6 (c) the court, court personnel, and court reporters and their staff; 7 (d) copy or imaging services retained by counsel to assist in the duplication 8 of confidential material, provided that counsel for the party retaining the copy or imaging 9 service instructs the service not to disclose any confidential material to third parties and to 10 immediately return all originals and copies of any confidential material; (e) 11 during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 12 reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 13 Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the designating party or ordered by the court. 14 Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal confidential 15 material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone 16 except as permitted under this agreement; (f) 17 any person whom a party calls as a trial witness and his or her counsel in 18 the action, but only for purposes of such person’s testimony and subject to the other provisions 19 of this Stipulated Protective Order; and/or (g) 20 21 22 the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 5.3 Filing Confidential Material. Before filing confidential material or discussing or 23 referencing such material in court filings, the filing party shall confer with the designating party 24 at least 14 days before filing to determine whether the designating party will remove the 25 confidential designation, whether the document can be redacted, or whether a motion to seal or 26 stipulation and proposed order is warranted. If any confidential information and other materials 27 are to be used in trial, they should be sealed and the proponent of any such materials as exhibits STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 4 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 or demonstrative aids or as the subject of oral statements at trial shall take appropriate 2 reasonable measures after reasonable advance notice to the other parties, to protect the 3 confidential information under the supervision of the Court. Local Civil Rule 5(g) sets forth 4 the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks 5 permission from the court to file material under seal. 5.4 6 Advice of Counsel. This Order shall not prevent or otherwise restrict any 7 attorney of record in this action from rendering advice to his or her client with respect to the 8 action, and in the course thereof, referring to or relying generally upon his or her examination 9 of documents or materials designated as confidential. 10 11 6. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 6.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each 12 party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this agreement 13 must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the 14 appropriate standards. The designating party must designate for protection only those parts of 15 material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify, so that other 16 portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not 17 warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this agreement. 18 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 19 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 20 unnecessarily encumber or delay the case development process or to impose unnecessary 21 expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the designating party to sanctions. 22 If it comes to a designating party’s attention that information or items that it designated 23 for protection do not qualify for protection, the designating party must promptly notify all other 24 parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 25 6.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this 26 agreement, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, disclosure or discovery material that qualifies 27 for protection under this agreement must be clearly so designated before, when or after the STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 5 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 material is disclosed or produced. 2 (a) Information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents 3 and deposition exhibits, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial 4 proceedings): the designating party must affix the word “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that 5 contains confidential material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 6 for protection, the producing party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 7 making appropriate markings in the margins). (b) 8 9 Testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings: the parties and any participating non-parties must identify on the record, during the deposition, 10 hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, without prejudice to their right to so 11 designate other testimony after reviewing the transcript. Any party or non-party may, within 12 fifteen days after receiving the transcript of the deposition or other pretrial proceeding, 13 designate portions of the transcript, or exhibits thereto, as confidential. If a party or non-party 14 desires to protect confidential information at trial, the issue should be addressed during the pre- 15 trial conference. (c) 16 Other tangible items: the producing party must affix in a prominent place 17 on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the 18 word “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant 19 protection, the producing party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s). 6.3 20 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If corrected, an inadvertent failure to 21 designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the designating party’s 22 right to secure protection under this agreement for such material. Upon correction of a 23 designation, the receiving party must make reasonable efforts to ensure that the material is 24 treated in accordance with the provisions of this agreement. 25 7. 26 27 CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 7.1 Timing of Challenges. Any party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a designating party’s confidentiality designation is STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 6 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a 2 significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a party does not waive its right to challenge a 3 confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original 4 designation is disclosed. 7.2 5 Meet and Confer. The parties must make every attempt to resolve any dispute 6 regarding confidential designations without court involvement. Any motion regarding 7 confidential designations must include a certification, in the motion or in a declaration or 8 affidavit, that the movant has engaged in a good faith meet and confer conference with other 9 affected parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action. The certification must 10 list the date, manner, and participants to the conference. A good faith effort to confer requires a 11 face-to-face meeting or a telephone conference. 7.3 12 Judicial Intervention. If the parties cannot resolve a challenge without court 13 intervention, the designating party or challenging party may file and serve a motion under 14 Local Civil Rule 7 (and in compliance with Local Civil Rule 5(g), if applicable) regarding the 15 confidentiality designation. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose 16 (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the 17 challenging party to sanctions. All parties shall continue to maintain the material in question as 18 confidential until the court rules on the challenge. 19 8. 20 21 PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION If a party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that 22 compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as 23 “CONFIDENTIAL,” that party must: 24 25 26 27 (a) promptly notify the designating party in writing and include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 7 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 subject to this agreement. Such notification shall include a copy of this agreement; and (c) 2 cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued 3 by the designating party whose confidential material may be affected. 4 9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 5 6 confidential material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this agreement, 7 the receiving party must immediately (a) notify in writing the designating party of the 8 unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the 9 protected material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were 10 made of all the terms of this agreement, and (d) request that such person or persons execute the 11 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 12 10. 13 INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL When a producing party gives notice to receiving parties that certain inadvertently 14 15 produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the 16 receiving parties are those set forth in FRCP and Local Civil Rule 26(b). This provision is not 17 intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order or 18 agreement that provides for production without prior privilege review. The parties shall confer 19 on an appropriate non-waiver order under Federal Rule of Evidence 502. 20 11. 21 NON-TERMINATION AND RETURN OF DOCUMENTS Within 60 days after the termination of this action, including all appeals, each receiving 22 party must return all confidential material to the producing party, including all copies, extracts 23 and summaries thereof. Alternatively, the parties may agree upon appropriate methods of 24 destruction. 25 Notwithstanding this provision, counsel are entitled to retain one archival copy of all 26 documents filed with the court, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, correspondence, 27 deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 8 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 work product, even if such materials contain confidential material. The confidentiality obligations imposed by this agreement shall remain in effect until a 2 3 designating party agrees otherwise in writing or a court orders otherwise. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 5 6 7 DATED: August 3, 2017 /s/Jeffrey Smoot Jeffrey Smoot, WSBA #39335 Law Office of Jeffrey L. Smoot 1725 SW Roxbury Street, Suite 2 Seattle, WA 98106-2752 Telephone: (206) 823-1829 E-Mail: jeff@jeffsmootlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff Kamlawanti Gounder DATED: August 3, 2017 /s/Frederick A. Haist Frederick A. Haist, WSBA #48937 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 Telephone: (206) 622-3150 Fax: (206) 757-7112 E-Mail: frederickhaist@dwt.com Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the production of any documents in this proceeding 22 shall not, for the purposes of this proceeding or any other proceeding in any other court, 23 constitute a waiver by the producing party of any privilege applicable to those documents, 24 including the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product protection, or any other privilege 25 or protection recognized by law. // 26 27 // STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 9 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 2 Dated this 4th day of August 2017. 3 A 4 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 10 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax 1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 I, _____________________ [print or type full name], of _____________________ 4 [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and 5 understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court 6 for the Western District of Washington on _________ [date] in the case of KAMLAWANTI 7 GOUNDER a/k/a KALMA GOUNER, individually, and the marital community composed of 8 KAMLAWANTI GOUNDER and JOHN DOE GOUNDER, Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN 9 CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association; and DOES 1- 10 10, Defendants, Case No. 2:17-cv-00846-RSM. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all 11 the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to 12 so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly 13 promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this 14 Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the 15 provisions of this Order. 16 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 17 Western District of Washington for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated 18 Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Date: _____________________________________ City and State where sworn and signed: _____________________________________ Printed name: _____________________________________ Signature: _____________________________________ 27 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 11 4851-7727-4443v.1 0036234-000652 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O F FI CE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?